multichannel merchant
RSS Feeds Advertising | Contact Us | DIRECT | E-Newsletters | Subscribe
advanced
search
 

R.R. Donnelley's Domination
Dec 1, 2006 12:00 PM , By Jim Tierney


JobZone
Search and post jobs for the Multichannel Merchant. Including jobs for brand & agency marketers, e-commerce, catalog marketers, ops & fulfillment, direct marketing and more.  
Click here to access JobZone

Find any supplier you need - agencies, CRM, fulfillment, lists, e-commerce, paper, printers, telemarketing, and more.
Featured Categories
Fulfillment
Warehousing
Lists & Data
Telemarketing
Merch. Order Processing
Shipping & Distribution
Print, Production & Paper
Lists and Data Processing
:: view all categories
toolbox
ListFinder
Get free access to more than 50,000 list data cards - one of the most comprehensive databases in the industry.
>> Search Now

sponsored content

The Oct. 31 announcement that printer R.R. Donnelley & Sons had agreed to acquire competitor Banta Corp. had some industry watchers unsure whether to view the news as a Halloween trick or treat.

After all, the $8.43 billion R.R. Donnelley was already the largest printer in North America. Considering that Donnelly and the $1.54 million Banta are key players in the catalog-printing sector, it would appear that the deal would leave mailers fewer choices for getting their books printed.

During a Nov. 1 conference call, Donnelley CEO Mark Angelson said: “Banta is an exceptional fit with R.R. Donnelley. This combination will create immediate cross-selling opportunities with our blue-chip customers as well as offer substantial synergies in our procurement, manufacturing, and services operations.” Like Donnelley, Banta has operations in Europe and Asia as well as in the U.S. Some observers believe that Banta will create opportunities for additional scale in locations where Donnelley is already present.

The merger, says Banta spokesperson Mark Fleming, will enable Chicago-based Donnelley to expand the range of products and services it offers customers. “Donnelley is more in the long-run printing solutions, while Banta does more short and medium runs,” he notes.

The deal, expected to close in the first quarter of 2007, is valued at about $1.3 billion, nearly 19% over Banta's Oct. 31 closing share price on the New York Stock Exchange of $44.28. During the conference call, Angelson said he sees at least $75 million in savings following the merger. That takes into account the $35 million in efficiencies that Menasha, WI-based Banta announced in September, which include closing five printing plants and eliminating 500 jobs. As for the remaining $40 million in savings, Angelson declined to offer specifics but said they could come through more efficient procurement as well as consolidating operational redundancies.

Michael Wade, director of sales and marketing at Deerfield, IL-based distributor Wade Paper Corp., believes the deal will benefit customers if Donnelley can indeed create money-saving efficiencies and then pass the savings on to its customers. But, he warns, “as with any consolidation/merger, they could lose customers if the transition is not executed smoothly,” although he would not comment further on what could go wrong.

For the most part, however, catalogers and printing and paper industry executives are looking at the positives of the deal.

Mailers weigh in

Some catalogers may worry that the loss of a major supplier could lead to higher prices across the sector. But the resulting efficiencies could possibly lead to lower printing prices, says John Maine, vice president of the Bedford, MA-based forest industry research group RISI.

“To the extent that the merger might improve efficiency and lower print production costs, it could benefit the magazine and catalog industry,” Maine says. “Synergies and efficiency gains with mergers can lead to both improved profitability for the printer as well as reduced cost for the publisher, as long as market shares don't get so high as to impede competition.”

Many catalogers are speculating on the potential for efficiencies on the part of Donnelley. William McCarthy, CEO of the Southwest Indian Foundation, a Gallup, NM-based nonprofit organization that supports Native Americans through catalogs, a Website, a gift shop, and donations, is one of them. He has dealt with both Banta and Donnelley over the years. “I've used them simultaneously. Both have good workforces, good companies, a lot of good people,” he says.

As for the potential ramifications of the deal on catalogers and printers alike, “so much depends on how R.R. Donnelley handles the acquisition,” McCarthy says, echoing Wade. “Any time you have this type of acquisition, you're going to have some cleansing because some work sectors won't need to be duplicated.”

The acquisition, says Michael Baum, president of Madison, WI-based The Guild, a purveyor of artworks and artisan decor and jewelry, is “a reflection of the reality that the print business is very competitive and margins are being squeezed.” Donnelley is “very good” at looking for efficiencies, “but it's unlikely to affect production costs much.” But if the additional capacity that Donnelley will gain enables the printer to do more imaginative things with comailing and other tactics that can help mailers hold postage costs down, “that could be a plus,” Baum adds.

Simon Nynens, CEO of Shrewsbury, NJ-based Wayside Technology Group, a distributor of software for engineers and other computer professionals, says the acquisition appears to be a “good fit for a market leader like R.R. Donnelley & Sons.”

Like Southwest Indian Foundation, Wayside (formerly Programmer's Paradise) has worked with both Donnelley and Banta in the past. “Banta seems to be further ahead in technology, and Donnelly bought that technology and know-how instead of building the technology,” Nynens says.

Banta “does not have scale to really benefit from the investment, so a market leader buys them and integrates that offering,” he continues. “Sort of like Microsoft buying all these small companies to integrate into their offerings.”

For Nynens, “the real question is, how many of their customers are waiting for this technology, are not using it from someone else yet, and will either upgrade or switch to Donnelly?”

As a direct marketing customer in the technology sector, “we see this as a logical next step and as a possible catalyst for other competitors of Donnelley to step up their technology innovation,” Nynens says. “That is always good for customers, so yes, we see this as a positive.”



Back to Top

BROWSE ISSUES
August 1, 2008 Cover July 1, 2008 Cover June 1, 2008 Cover May 1, 2008 Cover April 1, 2008 Cover March 1, 2008 Cover February 1, 2008 Cover
  August 1, 2008 July 1, 2008 June 1, 2008 May 1, 2008 April 1, 2008 March 1, 2008 February 1, 2008


BROWSE E-NEWSLETTERS
   
  View Sample
Subscribe
View Sample
Subscribe
View Sample
Subscribe
View Sample
Subscribe
View Sample
Subscribe
View Sample
Subscribe
 

BROWSE BACK ISSUES